San Bernard River
Photos by A. Smith
HomePrevious ArticlesMouth PicturesResolutionsAboutNewsPhotosContactsPrivacy PolicyLinksWater Quality Data

Welcome to our forum - San Bernard TX. Forum  LINK


The Brazoria County News
March 6, 2014
Funds for dredging of San Bernard may be available
 The Deepwater Ho­rizon oil spill did not directly affect Brazo­ria County, but funding from fines and penalties related to the incident could be awarded to two projects in the county, re-opening the mouth of the San Bernard River again and renovating and extending the Quintana pier.
At their meeting Feb­ruary 25, Brazoria Coun­ty Commissioners voted unanimously to enter into negotiations with Dannenbaum Engineer­ing Services to develop a grant application under the Restore Act passed by Congress.
The Restore Act has about $500 million to $1.2 million in funds available in Texas, and only the 16 coastal coun­ties are eligible.
Reopening the mouth of San Bernard River is an important project because it affects barge traffic on the intracoast­al canal, especially at the west floodgate of the Brazos River. With the mouth closed, water from the San Bernard enters the intracoastal ca­nal and flows toward the floodgate.
The situation was re­solved in 2009 when the mouth was opened, but a bad drought caused the mouth to silt over again in 2012.
Chris Sallese of Dan­nenbaum Engineering spoke to Commissioner’s Court about the issue. Sallese is the retired Col­onel of the U.S. Corps of Engineers, Galveston District and worked on the original opening.
Sallese said that if the environmental stud­ies from 2009 could be modified to address the current problem, con­struction could begin within 12 months. If the 2009 study cannot be used, a new study, cost­ing around a million dollars and requiring 18-24 months to com­plete would be required. He added, however, that a single environmental study covering the en­tire Texas Coast is be­ing looked into so that expensive, long duration studies would not be re­quired for each individu­al project.
A permanent solution to the San Bernard prob­lem would be some type of jetties that would keep the silt from drifting and clogging the river.
If Restore Act funding is not awarded, it will likely remain undone until another source of funding is discovered.

The Facts: Option March 6, 2014
Grant funds the way to go for lasting San Bernard River fix
Today’s editorial was written by Yvonne Mintz, managing editor for The Facts.
No fix to the San Bernard River closure can be guaranteed to last forever, but but one being considered certainly would keep it open a lot longer than the dredging that temporarily the river mouth. That $2.4 million U.S. Army Corps of Engineers project dredged the silted-shut San Bernard open in 2009, only to have it close again by December 2013.Brazoria County commissioners hope a plan being considered now will have more staying power, and they are seeking out grant money available to coastal states to make it happen. If awarded the Restore Act funds, local officials hope to dredge the mouth of the San Bernard River open and build two jetties on either side, in deep enough water so it won’t close again.
Commissioners last week hired an engineering firm to help prepare their application for a Restore Act grant. Those grants are being paid from fines assessed as a result of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill, and our county seems a prime candidate to receive a share of the money. For one thing, our proximity to the spill works in our favor when grants are being considered. For another, this project clearly is needed and worthwhile.
With the mouth of the river closed, the river mostly makes a left turn at the Intracoastal Waterway, exiting through the west floodgate of the Brazos River. The flow pattern causes silting around that floodgate, which can lead to problems for barge traffic passing through the area.
The project is clearly valuable, but because of its cost, it’s likely it won’t get done if we don’t win the grant.
The San Bernard project, together with an unrelated request for funding to renovate and extend the Quintana pier, would cost about $30 million. The work being considered at Quintana would extend that pier by 200 feet and put a “T” at the end of it.

Congress passed the Restore Act in 2012 to administer the penalties paid by responsible parties in the Deepwater Horizon incident, described as the largest accidental marine oil spill in the history of the petroleum industry. The total amount of available funding still is being negotiated, and the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality has not yet finalized the application process, but there’s a potential for about $500 million to $1.2 billion in Restore Act funds to be available to Texas. With only 16 coastal counties in Texas, the chances our projects will be accepted are pretty good. Commissioners are right to act to assure our county receives a portion of those funds, and the San Bernard River project is the clear choice as most pressing. The momentum to open the San Bernard again is building, thanks in part to an active group, Friends of the River San Bernard, who are making noise trying to make it happen. Members of the group applauded Commissioners Court hiring the engineering firm to begin work needed for the grant application. They also ought to be applauded, though, for providing the grassroots support and elbow grease that so often is needed to make these projects reality.


Below are three pictures of different angles of the San Bernard River mouth taken 1-11-14.

2-28-2014: The Facts: San Bernard fix in the works

Mike Holmes Texas Hunt Fish  click HERE

To monitor water movement at the Brazos Floodgates, go to: 

(This article and previous ones can be found on tPrevious Articles)

Pictures of the San Bernard River mouth have been moved to page "Mouth Pictures".